Benson v. Innovis Health, LLC
Plaintiff: Jonathan D. Benson
Defendant: Innovis Health, LLC
Case Number: 3:2015cv00047
Filed: June 10, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of North Dakota
Office: Southeastern Office
County: Cass
Presiding Judge: Ralph R. Erickson
Presiding Judge: Alice R. Senechal
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 29:1132
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER ADOPTING 22 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; denying 5 Motion for Attorney Fees; denying 5 Motion to Remand; and denying 18 Motion for Hearing by Chief Judge Ralph R. Erickson.(SH)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Benson v. Innovis Health, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jonathan D. Benson
Represented By: Benjamin E. Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Innovis Health, LLC
Represented By: Kristy L. Albrecht
Represented By: Elizabeth Lee Alvine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?