Tartt v. McClaughpin et al
Tracey Tartt |
Valley Bus and John McClaughpin |
3:2019cv00014 |
January 16, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of North Dakota |
Alice R Senechal |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed John McClaughpin served on 3/13/2019, answer due 4/3/2019 (js) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed Valley Bus served on 3/12/2019, answer due 4/2/2019 (as) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to John McClaughpin, and Valley Bus. (js) |
Filing 6 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alice R. Senechal directing service of the #4 Complaint filed by Tracey Tartt. (AS) |
Filing 5 CONSENT/REASSIGNMENT FORM by Tracey Tartt. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(js) |
Filing 4 COMPLAINT against John McClaughpin, Valley Bus (Filing fee: IFP) filed by Tracey Tartt. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(as) |
Filing 3 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alice R. Senechal granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The filing fee is waived. (AS) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Direct Assignment as to Tracey Tartt. Consent/Reassignment Form due by 1/30/2019. (lh) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tracey Tartt. (Attachments: #1 proposed Complaint, #2 Dismissal and Notice of Rights, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Mailing Envelope)(lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.