Cass County, North Dakota et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
City of Grand Forks, North Dakota and Cass County, North Dakota |
Beverly Sackler, Richard S. Sackler, Actavis Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC, McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt plc, Insys Therapeutics, Inc., Allergan plc, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Theresa Sackler, Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Endo International plc, Actavis LLC, Cardinal Health, Inc., David A. Sackler, Allergan Finance LLC, The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc., Purdue Products L.P., Cephalon, Inc., Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc., Mortimer D.A. Sackler, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Endo Health Solutions Inc., Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., Ilene Sackler Lefcourt, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Kathe A. Sackler, Purdue Pharmaceutical Products L.P., SpecGx LLC, Jonathan D. Sackler, Trust for the Benefit of Members of the Raymond Sackler Family, Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc. and Rhodes Pharmaceuticals L.P. |
3:2019cv00055 |
March 26, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of North Dakota |
Daniel L Hovland |
Alice R Senechal |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Actavis LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., Allergan Finance LLC, Allergan plc, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., Cephalon, Inc., Endo Health Solutions Inc., Endo International plc, Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Insys Therapeutics, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mallinckrodt LLC, Mallinckrodt plc, McKesson Corporation, Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc., Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharmaceutical Products L.P., Purdue Products L.P., Rhodes Pharmaceuticals L.P., Beverly Sackler, David A. Sackler, Jonathan D. Sackler, Kathe A. Sackler, Mortimer D.A. Sackler, Richard S. Sackler, Theresa Sackler, Ilene Sackler Lefcourt, SpecGx LLC, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc., Trust for the Benefit of Members of the Raymond Sackler Family, Watson Laboratories, Inc. (as) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Actavis LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., Allergan Finance LLC, Allergan plc, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., Cephalon, Inc., Endo Health Solutions Inc., Endo International plc, Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Insys Therapeutics, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mallinckrodt LLC, Mallinckrodt plc, McKesson Corporation, Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc., Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharmaceutical Products L.P., Purdue Products L.P., Rhodes Pharmaceuticals L.P., Beverly Sackler, David A. Sackler, Jonathan D. Sackler, Kathe A. Sackler, Mortimer D.A. Sackler, Richard S. Sackler, Theresa Sackler, Ilene Sackler Lefcourt, SpecGx LLC, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc., Trust for the Benefit of Members of the Raymond Sackler Family, Watson Laboratories, Inc., (Filing fee $400, receipt number 319000235) filed by Cass County, North Dakota, City of Grand Forks, North Dakota. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(as) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.