Embrey v. State of North Dakota et al
| William J.R. Embrey |
| State of North Dakota, Unknown Individuals and Wayne Stenehyem |
| 3:2019cv00080 |
| May 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of North Dakota |
| Alice R Senechal |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION requesting the Court to move forward with the case and order the summons and complaint served by William J.R. Embrey. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(js) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT/REASSIGNMENT FORM by William J.R. Embrey. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(as) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT against State of North Dakota, Wayne Stenehyem, Unknown Individuals filed by William J.R. Embrey. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of William J.R. Embrey)(lh) |
Filing 3
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alice R. Senechal granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The filing fee is waived. (AS)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Direct Assignment as to William J.R. Embrey. Consent/Reassignment Form due by 5/17/2019. (js) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by William J.R. Embrey. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of William Ebrey in Support of IFP Motion, #2 Proposed complaint and affidavit of Mr. Embrey, #3 Mailing Envelope)(js) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
