Hutchinson v. Rejuv Medical Aesthetic Clinic, Inc.
| Cheryl M. Hutchinson |
| Rejuv Medical Aesthetic Clinic, Inc. |
| 3:2019cv00226 |
| October 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of North Dakota |
| Alice R Senechal |
| Peter D Welte |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| DOCKET CORRECTION re: #12 RESPONSE to Motion. Clerks office added exhibit numbers to docket text. (js) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE to Motion re #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Cheryl M. Hutchinson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Affidavit of Mark Peschel, #2 Exhibit 1 - Patient Consent Form, #3 Exhibit 2 - Patient Consent Form, #4 Exhibit 3 - Manufacturer information, #5 Exhibit 4 - Rejuv website pages)(Peschel, Mark) Modified on 12/9/2019 to add exhibit numbers. (js) |
Filing 11
(Text Only) ORDER REASSIGNING CASE by Chief Judge Peter D. Welte. Case assigned to Chief Judge Peter D. Welte and referred to Magistrate Judge Alice R. Senechal for all further proceedings. (js)
|
| Filing 10 CONSENT/REASSIGNMENT FORM by Rejuv Medical Aesthetic Clinic, Inc. (js) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Direct Assignment as to Rejuv Medical Aesthetic Clinic, Inc.. Consent/Reassignment Form due by 12/3/2019. (js) |
| Filing 8 MEMORANDUM in Support re #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Rejuv Medical Aesthetic Clinic, Inc.. (Waller, Michael) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Rejuv Medical Aesthetic Clinic, Inc.. (Waller, Michael) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/REASSIGNMENT FORM by Cheryl M. Hutchinson. (as) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cheryl M. Hutchinson. Rejuv Medical Aesthetic Clinic, Inc. served on 10/25/2019, answer due 11/15/2019 (Peschel, Mark) |
| Filing 4 SECOND NOTICE of Direct Assignment as to Cheryl M. Hutchinson. Consent/Reassignment Form due by 11/12/2019. (js) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Direct Assignment as to Cheryl M. Hutchinson. Consent/Reassignment Form due by 10/29/2019. (js) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Rejuv Medical Aesthetic Clinic, Inc. (js) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Rejuv Medical Aesthetic Clinic, Inc. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 320000024) filed by Cheryl M. Hutchinson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(js) Modified on 11/4/2019 to correct party filed against in docket text - NEF Regenerated. (js) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hutchinson v. Rejuv Medical Aesthetic Clinic, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Rejuv Medical Aesthetic Clinic, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Michael C. Waller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cheryl M. Hutchinson | |
| Represented By: | Mark J. Peschel |
| Represented By: | Mark J Peschel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
