Graff v. Burgum et al
| Daniel Bruce Graff |
| Tony Gehrig, Dr. Andrew Stahl, Dave Piepkorn, Arlette Preston, John Strand, Dr. Tim Mahoney, Douglas James Burgum and DMV |
| 3:2020cv00201 |
| November 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of North Dakota |
| Alice R Senechal |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT (sj) |
Filing 6
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alice R. Senechal dismissing the #4 Complaint filed by Daniel Bruce Graff. (AS) Distributed on 12/9/2020 (sj).
|
| Filing 5 CONSENT/REASSIGNMENT FORM by Daniel Bruce Graff. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(sj) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT against Douglas James Burgum, DMV, Tony Gehrig, Tim Mahoney, Dave Piepkorn, Arlette Preston, Andrew Stahl, John Strand (Filing fee: IFP) filed by Daniel Bruce Graff.(pb) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Direct Assignment as to Daniel Bruce Graff. Consent/Reassignment Form due by 11/17/2020. (pb) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alice R. Senechal granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The filing fee is waived. (AS) Distributed on 11/3/2020 (pb).
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Daniel Bruce Graff. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint and Request for Injunction)(sj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
