Rohrich v. North Dakota, State of et al
Shane Rohrich |
North Dakota, State of, Cass County, PennyMac Loan Services and Halliday, Watkins & Mann, PC |
3:2023cv00134 |
July 24, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of North Dakota |
Alice R Senechal |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 Foreclosure |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 FOURTH NOTICE of Direct Assignment as to Shane Rohrich. Consent/Reassignment Form due by 9/13/2023. (pb) |
Filing 6 THIRD NOTICE of Direct Assignment as to Shane Rohrich. Consent/Reassignment Form due by 8/28/2023. (sj) |
Filing 5 SECOND NOTICE of Direct Assignment as to Shane Rohrich. Consent/Reassignment Form due by 8/16/2023. (sc) |
Filing 4 COMPLAINT against Cass County, Halliday, Watkins & Mann, PC, North Dakota, State of, PennyMac Loan Services (Filing fee: IFP) filed by Shane Rohrich. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(sj) |
Filing 3 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alice R. Senechal granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The filing fee is waived. (AS) Distributed on 7/25/2023 (sj). |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Direct Assignment as to Shane Rohrich. Consent/Reassignment Form due by 8/7/2023. (sc) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Shane Rohrich. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(sc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.