Sanderson v. Myrdal
| Mitchell S. Sanderson |
| Janne Myrdal |
| 3:2023cv00247 |
| December 29, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of North Dakota |
| Alice R Senechal |
| Peter D Welte |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alice R. Senechal granting #5 Motion to Dismiss and Remand. (AS) Distributed on 1/24/2024 (sc).
|
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: Certified Copy of #10 Order remanding case to state court mailed to Clerk of Walsh County Grafton, North Dakota. (sc) |
| Civil Case Terminated. Case Dismissed and Remanded to State Court. See Order at #10 . (sc) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE to Motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss Petition to Remove to Federal CourtMOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Mitchell S. Sanderson. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Service, #2 Petition for Writ of Mandamus, #3 Petition for Writ of Mandamus - Affidavit of Service, #4 Application to Proceed IFP, #5 Mailing Envelope)(pb) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/REASSIGNMENT FORM by Mitchell S. Sanderson. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(sj) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/REASSIGNMENT FORM by Janne Myrdal. (pb) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Direct Assignment as to Janne Myrdal. Consent/Reassignment Form due by 1/18/2024. (sc) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss Petition to Remove to Federal Court, MOTION to Remand to State Court by Janne Myrdal. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss Petition to Remove to Federal Court and Remand to State Court, #2 Affidavit of Howard D. Swanson, #3 Exhibit 1 to Affidavit of Howard D. Swanson - Docket for Case No. 50-2023-CV-00129)(Swanson, Howard) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Direct Assignment as to Mitchell S. Sanderson. Consent/Reassignment Form due by 1/17/2024. (sc) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Mitchell S. Sanderson from Walsh County Court, case number 50-02023-CV-00129. Filing fee IFP. filed by Mitchell S. Sanderson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Complaint, #2 Letter from Mitchell Sanderson, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Mailing Envelope)(sc) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alice R. Senechal granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The filing fee is waived. (AS) Distributed on 1/2/2024 (sc).
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Mitchell S. Sanderson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Petition for Removal, #2 Exhibit A: Complaint, #3 Letter from Mitchell Sanderson, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Mailing Envelope)(sc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sanderson v. Myrdal | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mitchell S. Sanderson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Janne Myrdal | |
| Represented By: | Howard D. Swanson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
