Abdikarim v. Jahner et al
Zakariya Abdikarim |
C. Olson and Jesse Jahner |
3:2024cv00190 |
September 17, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of North Dakota |
Alice R Senechal |
Peter D Welte |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 (Text Only) ORDER REASSIGNING CASE by Chief Judge Peter D. Welte. Case reassigned to Chief Judge Peter D. Welte, as presiding judge, and Magistrate Judge Alice R. Senechal, as referral judge, for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Alice R. Senechal no longer assigned to the case as presiding judge. Distributed on 9/18/2024(sj) |
Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Magistrate Judge Alice R. Senechal that the #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Zakariya Abdikarim be denied. Objections to R&R due by 10/2/2024. (AS) Distributed on 9/18/2024 (sj). |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Direct Assignment as to Zakariya Abdikarim. Consent/Reassignment Form due by 10/2/2024. (sl) |
Filing 2 PLRA Packet. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons, #3 Mailing Envelope)(sl) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Zakariya Abdikarim. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Inmate Account and Assets, #2 Mailing Envelope)(sl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.