Borsheim Builders Supply, Inc. v. Harstad-Cook et al
Borsheim Builders Supply, Inc. |
Daphney Harstad-Cook and Vicki Harstad |
4:2014cv00083 |
July 24, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of North Dakota |
Northwestern Office |
Williams |
Daniel L. Hovland |
Charles S. Miller |
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 93 ORDER: Settlement Conference set for 2/27/2015 at 9:00 AM in Bismarck Courtroom 2 before Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG) |
Filing 68 ORDER adopting 64 Stipulated Protective Order for Standard Litigation. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr.(KT) |
Filing 49 ORDER: Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/12/2016 at 01:30 PM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr.(KT) |
Filing 34 ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 10/9/2014 at 10:30 AM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG) |
Filing 17 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. granting 16 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Larina A. Alton. (KT) |
Filing 15 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. granting 13 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Christopher A. Seidl; granting 14 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Aaron R. Thom. (BG) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.