Northern Bottling Co., Inc. v. PepsiCo, Inc.
Plaintiff: Northern Bottling Co., Inc.
Defendant: PepsiCo, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2015cv00133
Filed: September 16, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of North Dakota
Office: Northwestern Office
County: Ward
Presiding Judge: Daniel L. Hovland
Presiding Judge: Charles S. Miller
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 132 ORDER by Judge Daniel L. Hovland granting 129 Motion for Bill of Costs. (CM)
December 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 127 ORDER by Judge Daniel L. Hovland granting 86 Motion for Summary Judgment; finding as moot 112 Motion for Hearing. (CM)
November 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 94 ORDER: Plaintiff's response to defendant's motion for summary judgment due by 11/30/2018. Defendant's reply due by 12/21/2018. Final Pretrial Conference REset for 9/16/2019 at 2:00 PM in by telephone before Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (Previously set for 3/19/2019). Jury Trial REset for 9/23/2019 at 9:00 AM in Bismarck Courtroom 1 before Chief Judge Daniel L. Hovland (10 days, previously set for 4/1/2019). By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)
October 22, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. granting 87 Motion for Leave to File Under Seal. (GD)
February 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 79 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. granting 78 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Patricia T. Mathy. (BG) NEF regenerated to PHV attorney on 2/1/2018 (cjs).
December 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 77 ORDER: Defendant shall produce documents as directed by the court in its order regarding the motions to compel by 2/28/2018. Plaintiff shall have until 3/30/2018 to complete its Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of Defendant. Plaintiff's Expert Witne ss Disclosures and Reports due by 5/15/2018. Defendant's Expert Witness Disclosures and Reports due by 7/2/2018. Dispositive Motions due by 9/5/2018. Final Pretrial Conference REset for 3/19/2019 at 2:00 PM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller Jr. Jury Trial REset for 4/1/2019 at 9:00 AM in Bismarck Courtroom 1 before Chief Judge Daniel L. Hovland (10 days). By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr.(Final pretrial conference and trial previously set for 4/10/2018 and 4/23/2018) (BG)
November 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. granting in part 53 Motion to Compel; granting in part 55 Motion for Protective Order. (BG)
July 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. granting 50 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Sondra Hemeryck. (BG) NEF regenerated to PHV attorney Hemeryck. (as)
June 9, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr granting 40 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Michelle Sullivan. (ZE) NEF regenerated to PHV attorney on 6/9/2017 (cjs).
March 29, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER granting 30 MOTION to Amend/Correct 16 Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 6/30/2017. Discovery Motions due by 6/30/2017., Plaintiff(s) Expert Witness Disclosures and Reports due by 7/24/2017. Defendant(s) Expert Witness Disclosures a nd Reports due by 8/25/2017. Dispositive Motions due by 10/30/2017. Final Pretrial Conference REset for 4/10/2018 at 11:00 AM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. Jury Trial REset for 4/23/2018 at 1:30 PM in Bismarck Courtroom 1 before Chief Judge Daniel L. Hovland (4 days). By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (Final pretrial conference and trial previously set for 8/20/2017 and 9/11/2017, respectively) (BG)
February 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER: Status Report due by 3/10/2017. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)
February 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER: Status Report due by 2/27/2017. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)
January 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER: All pretrial deadlines suspended pending further order of the court. Status report due by 2/6/2017. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)
December 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER: Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/29/2017 at 2:00 PM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)
November 12, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 12/14/2015 at 10:00 AM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Northern Bottling Co., Inc. v. PepsiCo, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Northern Bottling Co., Inc.
Represented By: Rodney E. Pagel
Represented By: James M. Ragain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PepsiCo, Inc.
Represented By: Patrick J. Ward
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?