Spisak v. Anderson
Petitioner: Frank G. Spisak, Jr.
Respondent: Carl Anderson
Case Number: 1:1995cv02675
Filed: December 15, 1995
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Cleveland Office
County: Richland
Presiding Judge: Solomon Oliver
Nature of Suit: Death Penalty
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 182 Order denying (Related Doc # 179 # 180 ) Petitioner's Motion to Order Ohio Department of Corrections to Record Client's 1/4/2011 Clemency Interview to Support Necessary Expert Testimony at Clemency Hearing Relevant to Client's Current Mental Functioning and Severe Illness. Signed by Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr on 1/3/2011. (D,M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Spisak v. Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Frank G. Spisak, Jr.
Represented By: Michael J. Benza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Carl Anderson
Represented By: Brenda S. Leikala
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?