Jells v. Mitchell, et al
Petitioner: Reginald Jells
Respondent: Betty Mitchell
Case Number: 1:1998cv02453
Filed: October 27, 1998
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Cleveland Office
County: Richland
Presiding Judge: Solomon Oliver
Nature of Suit: Death Penalty
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 136 Order denying Jells's Motion for Unconditional Writ of Habeas Corpus (Related Doc # 129 ); and denying Jells's Motion to Enforce the Writ of Habeas Corpus as Mnadated by the Sixth Circuit (Related Doc # 132 ). Signed by Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr on 3/31/2011. (D,M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jells v. Mitchell, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Reginald Jells
Represented By: William T. Doyle(Designation CJA Appointment)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Betty Mitchell
Represented By: Laurence R. Snyder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?