Javitch, Receiver v. First Union Securities et al
| Victor M. Javitch, Receiver |
| First Union Securities and Michael D'Angelo |
| 1:2001cv00780 |
| April 3, 2001 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| David A. Katz |
| Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
132
Order: The investors' motion for leave to file an intervening complaint (Doc. 112 ) be, and the same hereby is, denied. The investors' motions for class certification (Docs. 113 , 114 ), and the defendants'motion to stay ( Doc. 116 ), be, and the same hereby are, denied as moot. The clerk of court shall forthwith set this case for a telephonic status conference; not later than one week before that conference, the parties shall file a status report (or separate reports, if necessary) informing the undersigned as to what, if anything, remains to be done, and the schedule for doing it, before this case may be closed. Judge James G. Carr on 2/28/17.(C,D)
|
|
Filing
110
MEMORANDUM OPINION in response to first certified question from the Arbitration Board, the answer is No. The second certified question is moot. Judge David A. Katz on 7/14/14. (G,C)
|
|
Filing
85
MEMORANDUM OPINION denying Motion for summary judgment (Related Doc # 69 ); granting Motion for summary judgment (Related Doc # 71 ). Judge David A. Katz on 2/15/11.(G,C)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
