Freeman Equipment, Inc. v. Caterpillar, Inc.
Freeman Equipment, Inc. |
Caterpillar, Inc. |
1:2002cv01862 |
September 20, 2002 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Dan Aaron Polster |
Anti-Trust |
15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2002. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 Order of Dismissal signed by Judge Polster on 12/12/02. Case dismissed without prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2). (P, R) |
Filing 28 Order signed by Judge Polster on 12/10/2002 Denying Plaintiff's Motion to declare Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Moot (Related Doc #21 ), and Granting Plaintiff's Motion for leave Amend Complaint(Related Doc #22 ). Plaintiff to respond to motion to dismiss by 3:00 p.m. on 12/20/02. (P, R) |
Filing 27 Report of Parties Planning Meeting filed by Caterpillar, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A#2 Exhibit B#3 Exhibit C)(Cole, Kenneth) |
Filing 26 Opposition (Related Motion(s) #21 ) to Plaintiff's Motion to Declare Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Moot filed by Caterpillar, Inc.. (Cole, Kenneth) |
Filing 25 Opposition (Related Motion(s) #22 ) to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint filed by Caterpillar, Inc.. (Cole, Kenneth) |
Filing 24 Report of Parties Planning Meeting Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f) And LR 16.3(b)(3) filed by Freeman Equipment, Inc.. (Attachments: #1)(Wuliger, William) |
Filing 23 Marginal Order signed by Judge Polster on 12/4/2002 Granting Defendant's Motion to stay answering complaint(Related Doc #18 ) (P, R) |
Filing 22 Motion for leave to file amended complaint filed by Freeman Equipment, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support#2 Exhibit A: Amended Complaint#3 Verification#4 Patent Information)(Related document(s) #20 ) (B, B) |
Filing 21 Motion for order Plaintiff's Motion To Declare Defendants' Motion To Dismiss Moot Or, Alternatively, For Leave To Respond Thereto Until After Ruling Upon Plaintiff's Pending Motion For Leave To File Amended Complaint filed by Freeman Equipment, Inc.. (Wuliger, William) |
Filing 20 Notice Of Manual Filing filed by Freeman Equipment, Inc.. (Wuliger, William) |
Filing 19 Motion to dismiss counts I, II, III and IV of the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted filed by Caterpillar, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support #2 Exhibit A#3 Exhibit B#4 Affidavit Certificate of Compliance)(Cole, Kenneth) |
Filing 18 Motion to stay answering plaintiff's counts not subject to defendant's motion to dismiss counts I, II, III, and IV of the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted filed by Caterpillar, Inc.. (Cole, Kenneth) |
Filing 17 Marginal Order signed by Judge Polster on 11/13/2002 Granting Defendant's Motion for attorney Deana L. Cairo to appear pro hac vice. (Related Doc #14 ) (P, R) |
Filing 16 Marginal Order signed by Judge Polster on 11/13/2002 Granting Defendant's Motion for attorney Robert J. Brookhiser to appear pro hac vice. (Related Doc #13 ) (P, R) |
Filing 15 Marginal Order signed by Judge Polster on 11/13/2002 Granting Defendant's Motion for attorney Robert G. Abrams to appear pro hac vice. (Related Doc #12 ) (P, R) |
Filing 14 Motion for appearance pro hac vice of Deana L. Cairo filed by Caterpillar, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Cole, Kenneth) |
Filing 13 Motion for appearance pro hac vice of Robert J. Brookhiser filed by Caterpillar, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Cole, Kenneth) |
Filing 12 Motion for appearance pro hac vice of Robert G. Abrams filed by Caterpillar, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Cole, Kenneth) |
Filing 11 Marginal Order signed by Judge Polster on 11/4/2002 Granting Plaintiff's Motion to continue case management conference (Related Doc #9 ). Case management conference rescheduled for 12/12/2002 at 9:00 AM, at Chambers 18B. (P, R) |
Filing 10 Response (Related Motion(s) #9 ) to Motion for Continuance of Case Management Conference filed by Caterpillar, Inc.. (Cole, Kenneth) |
Filing 9 Motion to continue Case Management Conference filed by Freeman Equipment, Inc.. (Attachments: #1)(Wuliger, William) |
Filing 8 Order signed by Judge Polster on 10/16/02. Case to proceed in the electronic filing system. All further documents, notices and orders are be filed electronically. (Attachments: #1 Policy & Procedure Manual)(P, R) |
Filing 7 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order signed by Judge Polster on 10/16/02.Case management conference to be held on 11/22/2002 at 9:00 AM, at Chambers 18B. (P, R) |
Order (non-document) by Judge Polster on 10/16/2002 Granting Defendant's Motion for a 30 day extension of time to answer complaint (Related Doc #5 ). (P, R) |
Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Caterpillar, Inc.. (B, B) |
Filing 5 Unopposed Motion for a 30 day extension of time until 11/13/2002 in which to move, answer or otherwise plead in response to plaintiff's complaint filed by Caterpillar, Inc.. (B, B) Modified text on 10/11/2002 (B, B). |
Filing 4 Return of Service Executed upon defendant Caterpillar, Inc. by certified mail on 9/26/2002. (B, B) Modified text on 9/27/2002 (B, B). |
Filing 3 Notice of Placement of case in the CM/ECF Docketing System (B, BA) |
Filing 2 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge Hemann (B, BA) |
Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand (1 summons and Magistrate Consent Forms issued) against Caterpillar, Inc.. Filed by Freeman Equipment, Inc.. Filing fee paid; receipt number 636954. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(B, BA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.