CadleRock Joint Venture, L.P. v. Royal Indemnity Company
CadleRock Joint Venture, L.P. |
Royal Indemnity Company |
Royal Indemnity Company |
Ronald A. Fisher, Nancy Fisher, Mark Fisher, Sterling Wayne Pirtle, Anita Pirtle and Blaine Tanner |
1:2002cv16012 |
October 28, 2002 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Cleveland Office |
Cuyahoga |
James G. Carr (MDL 1490) |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 202 Order : Royal Motion in Limine 6 (02-16012, Doc. 172) is granted in part and denied in part. (Related Doc # 172 ). Judge James G. Carr on 2/21/2012.(S,AL) |
Filing 186 Order Royal Indemnity's motion re. choice of law is granted in part and denied in part as provided herein. (Related Doc # 115 ). Judge James G. Carr on 2/15/2012.(S,AL) |
Filing 178 Order Royal's motion for production of the CadleRock/Guardian Settlement Agreement (02-16012, Doc. 124; 02-16019, Doc. 96; 02-16022, Doc. 104) is granted. CadleRock's request for production of the Royal/Anthony Settlement Agreement is likewise granted. CadleRock and the Guardian Entities shall produce a copy of the CadleRock/Guardian Settlement Agreement to Royal within five (5) days of the date of this Order. Within five (5) days of the date of this Order, Royal also shall produce to CadleRock and to the Guardian Entities copies of the Royal/Anthony Settlement Agreement. (related Doc # 124 ). Judge James G. Carr on 2/10/2012.(S,AL) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.