Cohen v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co.
| Joyce Cohen |
| Plain Dealer Publishing Co. |
| 1:2004cv00681 |
| April 12, 2004 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Donald C Nugent |
| Labor: Other |
| 29 U.S.C. § 184 Violation Collection Bargain Agreement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2005. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 39 True copy of mandate from the USCA for the Sixth Circuit: Affirming the judgment of the District Court as to #35 Notice of Appeal (USCA# 04-4230). Date issued as mandate 12/1/05, No costs taxed (Related document #38 ) (H, S P) |
| Filing 38 Information copy from the USCA for the Sixth Circuit affirming district court judgment (related doc #35 ) (USCA #04-4230). Keith, Kennedy & Batchelder, Circuit Judges. Date issued 11/1/05. This is not a mandate. (C, K A) |
| Filing 37 Transcript Request by Joyce Cohen re #35 Notice of Appeal. Transcript is unnecessary, there were no hearings. (H, S P) |
| Filing 36 Acknowledgment from the USCA for Sixth Circuit of receipt of #35 Notice of Appeal (USCA# 04-4230). Date filed in USCA 10/7/04. (H, S P) |
| Filing 35 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals from the #33 Memorandum, Opinion and Order and #34 Order of Dismissal of 8/31/04, from #26 Memorandum of Opinion of 7/16/04 and from all Marginal Orders of 6/1/04 #14 , #15 , #16 and #17 , filed by attorney Merrie Frost for plaintiff Joyce Cohen. Filing fee of $255.00 received, receipt number 664439. (H, S P) |
Filing 34
Order for the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion this case is dismissed in its entirety. Judge Donald C. Nugent (R, J M)
|
| Filing 33 Memorandum, Opinion and Order Defendant is entitled to summary judgment on Count I of Plaintiff's Complaint, alleging retaliatory discharge under Ohio Rev. Code Section 4123.90. Therefore, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count I of Plaintiff's Complaint, which was converted by this Court to a Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 56, is hereby granted. Counts II and III of Plaintiff's Complaint were previously dismissed in this Court's Order dated July 16, 2004. Therefore, Plaintiff's Complaint is disposed of in its entirety. Judge Donald C. Nugent (R, J M) |
| Filing 32 Minutes of proceedings of Status Conference held before Judge Donald C. Nugent. (R, J M) Modified text 8/19/2004 (C, K A). |
| Filing 31 Reply to response to Motion to dismiss case (count I treated as Motion for Summary Judgment) filed by Plain Dealer Publishing Co. Related document(s) #3 and #26 ). (Attachments: #1 Appendix Unreported Cases)(Scholz, Karin signed by Todd Lebowitz) Modified text 8/16/2004 (C, K A). |
| Filing 30 Notice of manual filing of Affidavit of Plaintiff filed by Joyce Cohen. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Joyce Cohen) (M, P) |
| Filing 29 Opposition to Motion For Summary Judgment filed by Joyce Cohen. Related document(s) #3 #26 and #27 . (Attachments: #1 Affidavit (affidavit to be refiled with original signature(s) #2 Exhibit #3 Exhibit #4 Exhibit)(Frost, Merrie) Modified text/links 8/4/2004 (C, K A). |
| Filing 28 Case Management Conference held and the case is assigned to the Standard track. Discovery cut off date is 12/19/04 and the motion cut off date to be determined. Next scheduled status conference is set for 8/17/04 at 10:00 a.m. Judge Donald C. Nugent (R, J M) |
|
Filing 27
Order granting motion to dismiss counts II and III of complaint. Motion to dismiss count I will be treated by the Court as one for summary judgment. Plaintiff has 30 days to respond (related doc #26 ) Judge Donald C. Nugent (R, J M) Modified text/link 7/22/2004 (C, K A).
|
| Filing 26 Memorandum Opinion granting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss as to Counts II and II of Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count I of Plaintiff's Complaint, alleging retaliatory discharge in violation of Ohio Rev. Code Section 4123.90, will be treated by the Court as one for summary judgment as provided for in Rule 56. Plaintiff shall have 30 days from the date of this Order to respond to the arguments and evidence set forth by Defendant in its Motion. Defendant may file a reply as provided for in Local Rule 7.1(e). Judge Donald C. Nugent (Related doc #3 ) (R, J M) Modified to create link on 7/20/2004 (B, B). |
| Filing 25 Report of Parties' Planning Meeting filed by all parties. (Scholz, Karin) |
| Filing 24 Notice of dismissal of the motion to continue the case managment conference filed by Joyce Cohen. Related document(s) #23 . (Frost, Merrie) |
| Filing 23 Motion to continue The Case Management Conference filed by Joyce Cohen. Related document(s) #21 . (Frost, Merrie) |
| Filing 22 Reply to response to Motion to dismiss case filed by Plain Dealer Publishing Co.. Related document(s) #3 . (Attachments: #1 Unreported Cases)(Scholz, Karin) |
| Filing 21 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order with case management conference to be held on 7/21/2004 at 09:30 AM at Chambers 15A. Judge Donald C. Nugent (R, J M) |
| Filing 20 Opposition to Motion to dismiss case filed by Joyce Cohen. Related document(s) #3 . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit #2 Exhibit)(Frost, Merrie) |
| Filing 19 Marginal order granting Motion for extension of time until 6/14/04 to respond to motion to dismiss (Related Doc #18 )Judge Donald C. Nugent(R, J M) Modified text 6/7/2004 (C, K A). |
| Filing 18 Motion for extension of time until 6/14/04 to file response to defendant's motion to dismiss filed by Joyce Cohen. (Frost, Merrie) Modified text 6/3/2004 (C, K A). |
| Filing 17 Marginal order denying Motion for Additional Time to Conduct Discovery. Defendant has filed a Motion to Dismiss, not Motion For Summary Judgment and if Plaintiff needs additional time and/or specific discovery, application may be made to Court.(Related Doc #9 )Judge Donald C. Nugent(R, J M) Modified text 6/3/2004 (C, K A). |
| Filing 16 Marginal order denying Motion as Moot inasmuch as Court has ruled on pending motions. (Related Doc #8 )Judge Donald C. Nugent(R, J M) Modified text 6/1/2004 (C, K A). |
| Filing 15 Marginal order denying Motion to strike (Related Doc #7 )Judge Donald C. Nugent(R, J M) Modified text 6/1/2004 (C, K A). |
| Filing 14 Marginal Order denying Motion for default (Related Doc #6 )Judge Donald C. Nugent(R, J M) Modified text 6/1/2004 (C, K A). |
| Filing 13 Response to Motion to strike Portions of Defendant's Motion To Dismiss filed by Plain Dealer Publishing Co.. Related document(s) #7 . (Scholz, Karin) |
| Filing 12 Response to Motion to stay Response Time to Defendant's Motion To Dismiss filed by Plain Dealer Publishing Co.. Related document(s) #8 . (Scholz, Karin) |
| Filing 11 Response to Motion for default Judgment filed by Plain Dealer Publishing Co.. Related document(s) #6 . (Scholz, Karin) |
| Filing 10 Response to Motion for extension of time To Conduct Discovery filed by Plain Dealer Publishing Co.. Related document(s) #9 . (Scholz, Karin) |
| Filing 9 Motion for extension of time To Conduct Discovery filed by all plaintiffs. Related document(s) #3 . (Frost, Merrie) |
| Filing 8 Motion to stay Response Time to Defendant's Motion To Dismiss until after rulings on the motions to dismiss and for default judgment filed by all plaintiffs. Related document(s) #3 . (Frost, Merrie) Modified text on 5/13/2004 (C, B). |
| Filing 7 Motion to strike Portions of Defendant's Motion To Dismiss filed by all plaintiffs. Related document(s) #3 . (Frost, Merrie) |
| Filing 6 Motion for default Judgment filed by all plaintiffs. Related document(s) #3 . (Frost, Merrie) |
| Filing 5 Marginal Entry Order granting Joyce Cohen's motion for extension of time to respond to motion to dismiss until May 14, 2004.(Related Doc #4 )Judge Donald C. Nugent(R, J M) Modified text of docket entry on 5/4/2004 (B, B). |
| Filing 4 Motion for extension of time until 5/14/2004 To file Response to Defendant's Motion to dismiss filed by Joyce Cohen. Related document(s) #3 . (Frost, Merrie) Modified text of docket entry on 4/30/2004 (B, B). |
| Filing 3 Motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12 (b) (6) filed by Plain Dealer Publishing Co.. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support #2 Exhibit A#3 Exhibit A1#4 Exhibit A2#5 Exhibit B#6 Exhibit B1#7 Exhibit B2#8 Exhibit B3#9 Exhibit B4)(Lebowitz, Todd) Modified text of docket entry on 4/20/2004 (B, B). |
| Filing 2 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge McHargh (W, Jo) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal. Filed by Plain Dealer Publishing Co.. Filing fee paid; receipt number 659997. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A.#2 Exhibit B.#3 Civil Cover Sheet)(W, Jo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cohen v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Joyce Cohen | |
| Represented By: | Merrie M. Frost |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Plain Dealer Publishing Co. | |
| Represented By: | Elliot S. Azoff |
| Represented By: | Karin M. Scholz |
| Represented By: | Todd H. Lebowitz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
