Lupron Marketing and Sales Practice Litigation
| Aetna Health, Inc. |
| Lupron Marketing and Sales Practice Litigation |
| Kalish Kedia and Cleveland Urology Associates |
| 1:2004mc00056 |
| August 2, 2004 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Donald C Nugent |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2004. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Reply to response to Motion for sanctions and Withdrawal of Motion to Quash Subpoenas Issued to Kalish Kedia, M.D. and Cleveland Urology Associates filed by Cleveland Urology Associates, Kalish Kedia. Related document(s) #2 . (Rendon, Carole) |
| Filing 3 Response to Motion for sanctions and Withdrawal of Motion to Quash Subpoenas Issued to Kalish Kedia, M.D. and Cleveland Urology Associates filed by Aetna Health, Inc. Related document(s) #2 . (Attachments: #1 #2 #3)(Fogarty, Robert) Modified text, attachments not described, attorney notified by e-mail on 9/7/2004 (E, P). |
| Filing 2 Motion for sanctions and Withdrawal of Motion to Quash Subpoenas Issued to Kalish Kedia, M.D. and Cleveland Urology Associates filed by Kalish Kedia. (Attachments: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5)(Rendon, Carole) |
| Filing 1 Motion to quash subpoenas issued to Cleveland Urology Associates & Kalish Kedia. Filing fee paid. Receipt #663094. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A#2 Exhibit B#3 Exhibit C#4 Exhibit D#5 Exhibit E)(C, BA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
