Jerman v. Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich et al
| 1:2006cv01397 |
| June 7, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Patricia A. Gaughan |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
Judgment Entry: This Court, having issued its Memorandum of Opinion and Order granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 53 ) and granting Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Damages (Doc. 54 ), hereby enters judgment to plaintiff as to the underlying claim and denies "additional damages." Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 4/18/11. (LC,S) re 59 .
|
|
Filing
59
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is granted as to the underlying claim and denied as to damages. Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Damages is granted. Therefore, "additional damages" will not be awarded. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 4/13/11. (LC,S) re 53 , 54 .
|
|
Filing
51
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification is GRANTED. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 12/14/10. (LC,S) re 45
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jerman v. Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
