Zinser v. Freightliner Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Richard Zinser
Defendant: Freightliner Corporation and Caterpillar, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2007cv00102
Filed: January 16, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Cleveland Office
County: Richland
Presiding Judge: Solomon Oliver
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2007. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 11, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Stipulation & Order dismissing this case without prejudice. Signed by Judge Solomon Oliver Jr. on 6/11/2007.(D,M)
June 8, 2007 Filing 14 Stipulated Notice of Dismissal Under FRCP 41(a)(1) filed by Richard Zinser. (Riffe, G.)
May 23, 2007 Filing 13 Proposed Stipulation for Extension of Time until 6/22/07 respond to Discovery filed by Freightliner Corporation. (Cahill, Robert) Modified text on 5/25/2007 (G, Y).
April 24, 2007 Opinion or Order Order (non-document) granting Stipulation of Parties for Extension until 5/23/2007, for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff Richard Zinsers First Set of Interrogatories, Request for Production of Documents, and Request for Admissions. Entered by Judge Solomon Oliver Jr. on 4/24/2007.(D,M) Modified on 4/26/2007 (G, Y).
April 23, 2007 Filing 12 Proposed Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Discovery filed by Freightliner Corporation. (Cahill, Robert)
March 15, 2007 Filing 11 Case Management Conference/Minutes of Case Management Conference held on 3/14/2007. Fact Discovery due by 8/10/2007; Parties to be Joined and Pleading Amendments due by 5/15/2007; Plaintiff's expert report due by 8/10/2007; Defendant's expert report due by 10/10/2007; Dispositive Motions due by 11/2/2007. This case is assigned to the standard track. Parties shall meet on or before 6/1/2007, after an inspection of the vehicle has taken place to discuss resolution of the case. The parties will file a joint report with the court by 6/15/2007, regarding whether they have made progress regarding resolution. Signed by Judge Solomon Oliver Jr. on 3/14/2007.(D,M)
March 8, 2007 Filing 10 Report of Parties' Planning Meeting. Parties do not consent to this case being assigned to the magistrate judge. filed by Caterpillar, Inc.. (Palmer, Stacey)
February 21, 2007 Filing 9 Motion to excuse appearance of Party Representative filed by Freightliner Corporation. (McCrystal, James)
February 21, 2007 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] granting Defendant Freightliner's Motion to Excuse Party Representative Appearance (Related Doc #9 ). Entered by Judge Solomon Oliver Jr. on 2/21/2007.(D,M)
February 21, 2007 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] granting Motion of Defendant Caterpillar Inc., to Excuse In-Person Attendance of Party Representative at Case Management Conference (Related Doc #8 ). Entered by Judge Solomon Oliver Jr. on 2/21/2007.(D,M)
February 15, 2007 Filing 8 Motion to excuse In-Person Attendance of Party Representative at Case Management Conference filed by Caterpillar, Inc.. (Palmer, Stacey)
February 12, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order with case management conference to be held on 3/14/2007 at 11:00 AM at Chambers 17A before Judge Hon. Solomon Oliver Jr. Signed by Judge Solomon Oliver Jr. on 2/12/2007.(D,M)
February 9, 2007 Filing 6 Notice of Magistrate Consent form (D,M)
January 17, 2007 Filing 5 Answer to Complaint with Jury Demand (Related Doc #1 ) filed by Freightliner Corporation. (Cahill, Robert) Modified on 1/23/2007 (B, T).
January 17, 2007 Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Freightliner Corporation. (McCrystal, James)
January 12, 2007 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Caterpillar, Inc. (C,BA)
January 12, 2007 Filing 2 Answer to Complaint (Related Doc #1 ) filed by Caterpillar, Inc. (C,BA) Modified on 1/23/2007 (B, T).
January 12, 2007 Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Richland County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2006CV1441, with jury demand (Filing fee 350 receipt number 14660005939). Filed by Caterpillar, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A#2 Civil Cover Sheet) (C,BA)
January 12, 2007 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Baughman. (C,BA)
January 12, 2007 Notice by Clerk that Freightliner Corp. failed to file a corporate disclosure statement as required by Local Rule 3.13(b). (C,BA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Zinser v. Freightliner Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Freightliner Corporation
Represented By: James L. McCrystal, Jr.
Represented By: Robert E. Cahill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Caterpillar, Inc.
Represented By: Stacey A. Greenwell
Represented By: Kip T. Bollin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Zinser
Represented By: G. Bradley Riffe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?