Tucker v. Bobby

Tucker v. Bobby

Petitioner:	Christopher L. Tucker
Respondent:	David Bobby
Case Number:	1:2007cv00451
Filed:	February 16, 2007
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office:	Cleveland Office
County:	Cuyahoga
Presiding Judge:	Kathleen M. O'Malley
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 22, 2021	Filing 75 Memorandum of Opinion and Order. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 74 ); DISMISSES Petitioner's Amended Grounds for Relief as procedurally default (Ground One) and non-cognizable (Ground Two); and DENIES the Amended Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 40 ). The Court finds an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. Since Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right directly related to his conviction or custody, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 7/22/21. (S,HR)
March 16, 2010	Filing 18 Memorandum & Order. The Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 16 and Tucker's Petition is DISMISSED. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. Judge Kathleen M. O'Malley on 3/16/2010. (H,CM)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 22, 2021

Filing 75 Memorandum of Opinion and Order. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 74 ); DISMISSES Petitioner's Amended Grounds for Relief as procedurally default (Ground One) and non-cognizable (Ground Two); and DENIES the Amended Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 40 ). The Court finds an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. Since Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right directly related to his conviction or custody, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 7/22/21. (S,HR)

March 16, 2010

Filing 18 Memorandum & Order. The Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 16 and Tucker's Petition is DISMISSED. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. Judge Kathleen M. O'Malley on 3/16/2010. (H,CM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tucker v. Bobby
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Christopher L. Tucker
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: David Bobby
Represented By:	Mark J. Zemba
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?