Bowles v. City of Mansfield
| Vanessa Bowles |
| City of Mansfield, Ohio, Richland County Ohio, METRICH Enforcement Unit, A.S.O.R.T. Team, City of Ontario, City of Shelby, Ohio, Lance Combs, Steve Blust and David A Mack |
| 1:2007cv02276 |
| April 11, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Richland |
| Kathleen M. O'Malley |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
142
Memorandum and Order. The Court OVERRULES the parties' objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (R&R) and ADOPTS the R&R (Related doc # 121 ), as modified herein. Defendants' Motions for summary judgment (Related doc #'s 78 , 79 , 80 , 82 ) are GRANTED, except to the extent that Defendant ASORT had moved for summary judgment on the grounds that it is not sui juris (Related doc # 81 ), a motion that is DENIED. Judge Kathleen M. O'Malley on 9/30/2010. (H,CM)
|
|
Filing
121
Report and Recommendation. It is recommended that ASORT's motion for summary judgment regarding its legal status (doc. 81) be DENIED. It is recommendated that the other motions for summary judgment, (doc. 78, 79, 80 and 82) be GRANTED. The state causes of action should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Magistrate Judge Kenneth S. McHargh on 7/10/09. (E,P)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
