Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company v. ACE Akron/Cleveland Enterprises Incorporated et al
Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company |
ACE Akron/Cleveland Enterprises Incorporated, Akron Cleveland Enterprises Limited Liability Company and Karl T. Williams |
1:2007cv02291 |
July 27, 2007 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Cleveland Office |
Cuyahoga |
Donald C. Nugent |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 79 Order adopting the Report and Recommendation (ECF # 76 ) of Magistrate Judge Baughman, and the Motions of Summary Judgment filed by the Estate of Kevin Williams (ECF # 71 ) and National City Capital Corporation (ECF # 70 ) are denied. This case shall proceed to trial at 8:30 a.m. on Thursday, January 7, 2010. Further, because no party has made a jury demand in this matter, the case shall be tried to the Court. In its discretion, however, the Court shall empanel an advisory jury to hear this matter pursuant of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 39(c). Signed by Judge Donald C. Nugent on 11/19/09. (K,K) |
Filing 76 Report and Recommendation that both motions for summary judgment be denied (Related Doc # 70 , 71 ). Objections to R&R due by 11/11/2009. Referral Terminated (Related Doc # 74 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. on 10/28/2009. (G,GS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.