Lockhart v. Village of Woodmere et al
| LaMont Lockhart |
| Village of Woodmere, Ohio, Yolanda Broadie, James Jordan, Carolyn Patrick, Gerald Carrier, Joyce Holbert and Shelley B. Ross |
| 1:2007cv02517 |
| August 20, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| James S. Gwin |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
Memorandum Opinion and Order that: Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment are granted as to Plaintiff's 1983 14th Amendment Equal-Protection Violation (Count 3), 1983 First Amendment retaliation (Count 4) and Constructive dischar ge retaliation in violation of public policy (Count 5) claims. Defendant James Jordan's Motion for Summary Judgment is granted on all counts and he is dismissed from this action. In addition, Defendant Broadie's Motion for Summary Judgmen t is granted as to Count 1- Title VII retaliation. Defendant Village of Woodmere's Motion for Summary Judgment is denied as to Counts 1 (Title VII retaliation) and Count 6 (retaliation under 4112). Defendant Broadie's Motion for Summary J udgment is denied as to Count 6 ( retaliation under 4112). Count 2 is not a separate claim and will be addressed at trial with Count 1. This case will proceed to jury trial at 8:30 a.m. on 12/1/2008. Signed by Judge Donald C. Nugent on 11/14/2008.(Related doc 26 , 27 , 28 )(B,B)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
