Whiticare Engineering Company v. Sprint Spectrum, L.P. et al
| Whiticare Engineering Company |
| Sprint Spectrum, L.P., Global Signal, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp. |
| 1:2007cv02628 |
| August 29, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Stark |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
Judgment Entry Adopting the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Pearson 89 . Case is dismissed without prejudice, each party to bear its own costs. Any subsequent order setting forth different terms and conditions shall supersede this order. Should the parties desire the Court to consider retention of jurisdiction over the settlement, then the parties shall submit (under seal) a copy of the final settlement agreement for Judge Dowd's review and possible future reference. Signed by Judge David D. Dowd, Jr. on 3/27/2009. (M,De)
|
|
Filing
89
Report and Recommendation. The Court recommends the dismissal of all pending claims without prejudice. This dismissal shall be superseded by the parties' Rule 41 entry which should be filed by April 3, 2009 or as soon as practicable after April 2, 2009. Objections to R&R due by 4/9/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 03/26/2009. (M,TL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
