Halpern et al v. Atlas Van-Lines Inc.
David Halpern and Barbara Halpern |
Atlas Van-Lines Inc. |
1:2007cv02730 |
September 10, 2007 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Cleveland Office |
Cuyahoga |
Lesley Wells |
Personal Property: Other |
46 U.S.C. ยง 741 Shipping |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 Order Adopting Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Atlas motion to show cause is denied as moot; and its motion for dismissal under Rule 37 is denied. Atlas is awarded attorneys fees in the amount of $3,605.99, to be paid by the Halperns counsel, John A. Huettner. Telephone status conference with all counsel scheduled for 3/4/2009 at 10:00 a.m. (Related doc. nos. 18 , 22 , 23 ). Judge Lesley Wells on 2/25/09. (B,IE) |
Filing 22 Report and Recommendation that Atlas be awarded its reasonable costs, including attorney's fees, incurred in filing and prosecuting the motion to compel; that within seven days of any order awarding expenses that Atlas be ordered to furni sh the Court and counsel for the Halperns with an itemized accounting of its compensatory expenses; and that counsel for the Halperns shall then be ordered to pay that amount within seven days thereafter or file any specific objections as to any item of expense with the Court (Related Doc # 18 . Objections to R&R due by 2/13/2009. Referral Terminated (Related Doc # 21 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr on 01/30/2009. (G,GS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.