Bridge v. Ocwen Federal Bank et al
| Lisa Bridge |
| Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB, Ocwen Financial Corporation, OCWEN Loan Servicing, LLC, Aames Capital Corporation, Firstar Bank and Ocwen Federal Loan Servicing Company |
| 1:2007cv02739 |
| September 11, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| David D. Dowd |
| Truth in Lending |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
298
Order denying Plaintiffs' 291 Motion to stay proceedings related to the sale of property, or alternatively to vacate the Order of Sale on the basis that this Court's Partial Final Judgment Entry and Decree of Foreclosure is not a f inal appealable order. If Lisa Bridge desires to seek a stay of this Court's rulings on the motions related to the appraisal and sale of Lisa Bridge's property pending the Sixth Circuit's ruling on appeal, she may file a motion pursuan t to Rule 62 requesting a stay with bond no later than June16, 2014 by 12:00 noon. If Lisa Bridge requests a Rule 62 stay with bond pending appeal, then defendant Deutsche Bank shall inform the Court by the close of business on June 20, 2014 the amount of bond that Deutsche Bank considers to be an appropriate amount to obtain a stay. No extensions of either deadline will be granted. Judge David D. Dowd, Jr on 6/4/2014. (P,G)
|
|
Filing
297
Judgment Entry that for the reasons contained in the 296 memorandum opinion and order filed contemporaneously herewith, defendants' motion for summary judgment of Count I and part of Count IX of plaintiffs' third amended c omplaint (ECF 273 ) is GRANTED and for the reasons contained in the 296 memorandum opinion and order filed contemporaneously defendants' motion for summary judgment of Counts III, IV, V, VI and part of Count IX of plaintiffs' third amended complaint (ECF 233 ) is GRANTED. Signed by Judge David D. Dowd, Jr. on 5/30/2014. (M,De)
|
|
Filing
287
Order Denying Plaintiffs' Motion for the Court to recuse itself from this case (Related Doc # 276 ). The docket sheet in this case reflects that plaintiffs are now registered for electronic filing. Therefore, mail service of the Court's orders is no longer necessary. Signed by Judge David D. Dowd, Jr. on 2/28/2014.(M,De)
|
|
Filing
228
Partial Final Judgment Entry under Rule 54(b) and Decree of Foreclosure. The Court orders that unless the sums found to be due to Deutsche Bank are fully paid within ten (10) days from the date of this Partial Final Judgment Entry and Decr ee of Foreclosure, the equity redemption of the title holder(s) in the Property shall be foreclosed and the Property shall be sold free of the interest of all parties to this action subject to redemption by the judgment debtor pursuant to Section 2329.33 of the Ohio Revised Code, and in accordance with the procedures set forth in the court's Sixth Amended General Order 2006-16. In addition, an order of sale shall issue to the Master Commissioner directing him to appraise, advertise, a nd sell the Property according to the law and orders of this Court and to report his proceedings to the Court. Notice of the time and place of the sale of the Property shall be given to all persons who have an interest in the Property according to the provisions of Section 2329.26 of the Ohio Revised Code. The Court further Orders that the reasons contained in the 227 memorandum opinion filed contemporaneously with this Partial Final Judgment Entry, that plaintiffs motion to strike the affidavit of Crystal Kearse is Denied. Signed by Judge David D. Dowd, Jr. on 9/6/2013. (M,De)
|
|
Filing
187
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Before the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss the Counterclaims of Defendant Deutsche Bank (ECF 180 ), Deutsche Bank's Motion for Default Judgment, Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Motion to Dis miss Counterclaim, and Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim (ECF 181 ). After careful review of Plaintiffs' Rule 12 (b) (6) motion, the Court finds it to be without merit and DENIES the motion. This renders moot Deutsche Bank's motions to strike and for default judgment. Plaintiffs must respond to Defendant Deutsche Bank's Counterclaim by May 30, 2013. No extensions will be granted. Judge David D. Dowd, Jr on 5/8/2013. (P,G)
|
|
Filing
175
Memorandum Opinion and Order regarding 156 Motion to dismiss. No motion was made as to Count I; Count II is dismissed with prejudice; Count III is partially dismissed. The Count is limited to actions and damages on or a fter May 31, 2010; Count IV is partially dismissed. The Count is limited limited to actions and damages after May 31, 2010; Count V is partially dismissed. The Count is dismissed as evidence relating to Counts II, VII and VIII. The Count is als o dismissed as to evidence relating to actions and damages before May 31, 2010 on Counts III and IV, and, as to Count VI, to evidence relating to actions and damages before May 31, 2008; Count VI is partially dismissed. The Count is limited to actions and damages after May 31, 2008; Count VII is dismissed with prejudice; Count VIII is dismissed with prejudice; Count IX is partially dismissed. The civil conspiracy shown must be as to the Counts, as limited above. The conspiracy shown cannot be predicated on Counts II, VII or VIII, or the OSPCA and slander of credit claims prior to May 31, 2010, or any loss of consortium prior to May 31, 2008. The Court also strikes from the prayer for relief items numbered 2, 7 and 8 of Plaintiffs Third Amended Complaint. (ECF 148 at 779, 780). Defendants must answer, respond or otherwise plead to the Third Amended Complaint by by February 7, 2013. Any response by Plaintiffs to Defendants' filing is due February 15, 2013. Given the proposed trial date, the parties should assume there will be no extensions of these dates. Signed by Judge David D. Dowd, Jr. on 1/28/2013. (M,De)
|
|
Filing
130
Judgment Entry that for the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion 129 filed contemporaneously with this entry this case is dismissed. This is a final appealable order. Signed by Judge David D. Dowd, Jr. on 8/28/2009. (M,De)
|
|
Filing
79
Memorandum Opinion and Order: The Court's referral to Magistrate Judge Pearson is hereby terminated. Further, William Bridge's motion to intervene and for leave to file a second amended complaint (ECF 65 ) is granted. The proposed second amended complaint attached to the motion to amend will not be automatically filed by the Clerk even though the Court has granted leave to amend, and the Court's leave to amend does not require plaintiffs to file the proposed second amend ed complaint (see order for specifics). The second amended complaint should be filed by 4/24/09. Defendants' answers should be filed by 5/15/09. The Court declines to rule on the dismissal of Aames, and the Clerk is directed to terminate ECF [ 64] and 68 for record purposes only. Discovery is open and shall be concluded by 7/17/09. The Court will conduct a status conference at 12:00 noon on 8/4/09. Counsel are required to attend and bring their calendars for the purpose of establishing a trial date at that time. Signed by Judge David D. Dowd, Jr. on 4/13/09. Related documents 66 , 69 , 70 , 78 . (Terminated motions 64 and 68)(S,He)
|
|
Filing
78
Report and Recommendation: This matter has not been settled. Magistrate Judge Pearson recommends termination of this referral. This report should serve as notice to counsel to direct any such motions for leave to the attention of Judge Dowd rather than the undersigned. This report also recommends that the parties be ordered to file any such motions for leave within ten (10) days of the filing of this report. Objections to R&R due by 2/27/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 2/13/2009. Related documents 64 65 66 .(M,TL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
