Smith v. Wilson

Smith v. Wilson

Petitioner:	Henry Smith, Jr.
Respondent:	Julius Wilson
Case Number:	1:2007cv02863
Filed:	September 20, 2007
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office:	Cleveland Office
County:	Cuyahoga
Presiding Judge:	Sara Lioi
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 11, 2009	Filing 12 Opinion and Order: Magistrate Judge Pearson's report and recommendation is hereby adopted and petitioner's Writ of Habeas Corpus (Docket No. 1 ) is denied. Furthermore, the court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. (Related Doc # 11 ). Judge Sara Lioi on 3/11/2009. (P,J)
February 23, 2009	Filing 11 Report and Recommendation that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus 1 be dismissed with prejudice as statutorily time-barred, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 2244(d), and that Smith's request for appointment of counsel and evidentiary hearing be denied. Objections to R&R due by 3/9/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 2/23/2009. (P,G) Modified links on 11/20/2009 (P, S).

Date Filed

Document Text

March 11, 2009

Filing 12 Opinion and Order: Magistrate Judge Pearson's report and recommendation is hereby adopted and petitioner's Writ of Habeas Corpus (Docket No. 1 ) is denied. Furthermore, the court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. (Related Doc # 11 ). Judge Sara Lioi on 3/11/2009. (P,J)

February 23, 2009

Filing 11 Report and Recommendation that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus 1 be dismissed with prejudice as statutorily time-barred, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 2244(d), and that Smith's request for appointment of counsel and evidentiary hearing be denied. Objections to R&R due by 3/9/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 2/23/2009. (P,G) Modified links on 11/20/2009 (P, S).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Wilson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Henry Smith, Jr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Julius Wilson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?