Bell v. Cleveland, City of
| Carol Bell |
| Cleveland, City of, Richard A. DelVecchio, Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority and John Does 1-15 |
| 1:2007cv03224 |
| October 19, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| Christopher A. Boyko |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
Order denying as moot Defendant CMHA's Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. (Related Doc # 29 ); granting CMHA's Motion for judgment on the pleadings (Related Doc # 30 ). Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 03/03/09.(M,M)
|
|
Filing
50
Opinion and Order denying Defendant Richard Delvecchio's Motion for summary judgment on Plaintiff's Fourth Amendment claim and grants Delvecchio Summary Judgment on Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment claim. (Related Doc # 21 ). Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 02/04/09.(M,M)
|
|
Filing
49
Order denying in part and granting in part Plaintiff's Motions for Leave to File Affidavit and Leave to Supplement Affidavits (Related Doc # 45 (Related Doc # 46 ). Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 02/03/09.(M,M)
|
|
Filing
20
Memorandum and Order. As outlined in this Memorandum and Order, defendant's motion, directing plaintiff to file a reply to Delvecchio's answer is denied (Related documents 14 , 18 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth S. McHargh on 2/19/08. (R,N)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
