Webb et al v. United States of America et al
Joshawa Webb, Lakisha Webb and Juanita Brooks |
United States of America, Lee Lucas, Robert Cross, Unkown DEA Agents, Richland County, Chuck Metcalf, Unknown Richland County Sheriff's Officers, City of Mansfield, Matt Mayer, Larry Faith, Unknown Mansfield Police Officers, Dan George and Jamal Ansari |
1:2007cv03290 |
October 24, 2007 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Cleveland Office |
Richland |
Christopher A. Boyko |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 319 Opinion and Order. Plaintiffs' Motion for Evidentiary Sanctions at Trial (Related doc # 249 ) is denied. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 4/21/2017.(H,CM) |
Filing 225 Order. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Remaining Claims (Related Doc # 193 ) is granted. Plaintiffs' state law claims fail as a matter of law and are dismissed with prejudice. Judgment is granted for Defendants and against Plaintiffs on all Plaintiffs' remaining claims. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 3/18/2014.(H,CM) |
Filing 190 Opinion and Order. Defendants Lee Lucas, Matt Mayer, Robert Cross and Charles Metcalf's Motions for Summary Judgment based on Qualified Immunity (Related doc #'s 175 , 176 , 177 , 179 ) are granted. The Court dismisses Plaintif f's state law claims for Malicious Prosecution and Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress. The Court orders Plaintiffs to show cause why their remaining state law claims should not be dismissed. Plaintiffs shall submit their brief no later than 4/12/2013. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 3/28/2013. (H,CM) |
Filing 156 Memorandum Opinion and Order on Defendant Lee Lucas' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF #68) and Supplemental Motion to Dismiss Complaint (ECF #139). For the following reasons, the Court grants, in part and denies, in part, Lucas' Mot ions; <Supplemental Motion to supplement Defendant Lee Lucas supplemental brief for summary judgment based on Qualified Immunity/Motion to dismiss complaint reply as directed by the Court filed by Lee Lucas> with Certificate of Service filed by Lee Lucas Motion for summary judgment. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 12/9/2011(M,M) |
Filing 97 Opinion and Order granting Lucas' unopposed Motion for summary judgment on all Plaintiffs' claims, Related 68 . Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 10/19/09. (M,M) |
Filing 90 Order denying Plaintiffs' Motion to File an Amended Rule 56(f) affidavit in Response to Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (Related Doc # 82 ). Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 09/29/09.(M,M) |
Filing 89 Opinion and Order granting Defendants' George, Faith, Metcalf and Mayer's Motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity for alleged violations of Webb's constitutional rights (Related Doc # 61 62 63 and 64 ). Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 09/15/09.(M,M) |
Filing 88 Order. The Court finds that the need for a briefing schedule is moot since the parties have filed and fully briefed the qualified immunity issues (Related Doc # 57 ). Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 09/11/09.(M,M) |
Filing 87 Order granting the United States of America's Motion to Substitute Party subtituting the United States for federal Defendants Lee Lucas, Jamal Ansari and Robert Cross (Related Doc # 67 ). Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 09/09/09.(M,M) |
Filing 52 Order denying Defendant's Motion for Limited Stay of Proceedings (Related Doc # 36 ). The parties shall confer and file with the Court a proposed case management schedule and proposed date for a new case management date no later than two weeks from the filing of this Order. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 09/17/08.(M,M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.