Ashtabula River Cooperation Group II v. Conrail, Inc. et al
Ashtabula River Cooperation Group II |
Conrail, Inc., Consolidated Rail Corporation, American Premier Underwriters, Inc., Pennsylvania Lines LLC, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Norfolk Southern Railway Company, CSX Corporation and CSX Transportation, Inc. |
1:2007cv03311 |
October 25, 2007 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Cleveland Office |
Cuyahoga |
Patricia A. Gaughan |
Environmental Matters |
42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 97 Memorandum Opinion and Order: Defendant Acme Scrap Iron & Metal Company's Motion to Vacate Default is GRANTED. Defendant Acme Scrap Iron & Metal Company is hereby DISMISSED. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 8/13/10. (LC,S) re 94 |
Filing 83 Memorandum Opinion and Order: Defendant American Premier Underwriters, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Cross-Claims of Defendants Conrail, Inc., Consolidated Rail Corporation, Pennsylvania Lines LLC, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Norfolk Southern Railway Company, CSX Corporation, and CSX Transportation is DENIED. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 9/18/09. (LC,S) re 79 |
Filing 46 Memorandum Opinion and Order: Railroad Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Counts II, III and IV is granted. Signed by Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 4/14/08. (LC,S) re 17 |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.