Whittsett v. Gansheimer

Whittsett v. Gansheimer

Petitioner:	Dorez Whittsett
Respondent:	Richard Gansheimer
Case Number:	1:2008cv00245
Filed:	January 30, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office:	Cleveland Office
County:	Cuyahoga
Presiding Judge:	Solomon Oliver
Presiding Judge:	David S. Perelman
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 22, 2008	Filing 13 Order Adopting Report and Recommendation (re 11 ) of Magistrate Judge Perelman. The court dismisses Whittsette's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (re 1 ) and enters final judgment in favor of Respondent. The court further certifies that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(3), an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr on 10/22/2008. (D,M)
September 17, 2008	Filing 11 Report and Recommended Decision. In light of the procedural default of all ten claims for relief presented in the petition, and petitioner having failed to satisfy his burden of demonstrating cause for the procedural default and actual prejud ice deriving therefrom, these claims for relief are barred from consideration in habeas corpus, and, therefore, this court hereby recommends that they be dismissed. Objections to R&R due by 10/1/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Perelman on 9/17/08. (W,Jo)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 22, 2008

Filing 13 Order Adopting Report and Recommendation (re 11 ) of Magistrate Judge Perelman. The court dismisses Whittsette's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (re 1 ) and enters final judgment in favor of Respondent. The court further certifies that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(3), an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr on 10/22/2008. (D,M)

September 17, 2008

Filing 11 Report and Recommended Decision. In light of the procedural default of all ten claims for relief presented in the petition, and petitioner having failed to satisfy his burden of demonstrating cause for the procedural default and actual prejud ice deriving therefrom, these claims for relief are barred from consideration in habeas corpus, and, therefore, this court hereby recommends that they be dismissed. Objections to R&R due by 10/1/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Perelman on 9/17/08. (W,Jo)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Whittsett v. Gansheimer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Dorez Whittsett
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Richard Gansheimer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?