Lowe v. Cuyahoga County/Board of County Commissioners et al
| Angela Lowe |
| Cuyahoga County/Board of County Commissioners, Gerald T McFaul and John and Jane Does 1-15 |
| 1:2008cv01339 |
| June 3, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| Donald C. Nugent |
| Both |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
280
Order denying Third Party Plaintiff Cuyahoga County's 274 Motion for a New Trial and/or to alter/amend Judgment and/or for Relief from Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Greg White on 1/23/2013. (Related documents 272 , 273 ) (S,S)
|
|
Filing
273
Judgment Entry. Judgment is entered in favor of Third Party Defendant State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company. Each party shall bear its own costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Greg White on 10/25/2012. (Related document 272 ) (S,S)
|
|
Filing
232
Memorandum Opinion and Order. The 229 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. State Auto's Motion for Reconsideration 211 is DENIED. Trial set for 1/19/2012 will begin at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 17B. Judge Donald C. Nugent on 1/6/2012. (H,CM)
|
|
Filing
179
Judgment granting 165 the County's Motion for Summary Judgment, and denying 172 State Auto's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, re 178 . Judge Donald C. Nugent (C,KA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
