Dobrowolski v. Commissioner of Social Security

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Northern District Dobrowolski v. Commissioner of Social Security

Dobrowolski v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:	Kathy M Dobrowolski
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	1:2008cv01418
Filed:	June 12, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office:	Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI Office
County:	Cuyahoga
Presiding Judge:
Presiding Judge:	George J. Limbert
Presiding Judge:	Lesley Wells
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By:	42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 11, 2009	Filing 17 Report and Recommendation: It is recommended that the Court remand this case so that the Administrative Law Judge can address the disability determination of CMS and articulate the weight that he gave this decision and the reasons therefor; fu rther, remand is recommended so that the Administrative Law Judge can better analyze the factors of SSR 96-7p and explain his reasons for discounting plaintiff's testimony relating to her migraine headaches, the side effects of her medications, and the measures that she takes in order to reduce her pain; further, it is recommended that the Court remand the Administrative Law Judge's residual functional capacity for further analysis to the extent that it impacts his analysis of the CMS decision and plaintiff's credibility; however, it is recommended that the Court find no merit to plaintiff's specific residual functional capacity assertions (Related document 1 ). Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert on 8/11/09. (S,AA)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 11, 2009

Filing 17 Report and Recommendation: It is recommended that the Court remand this case so that the Administrative Law Judge can address the disability determination of CMS and articulate the weight that he gave this decision and the reasons therefor; fu rther, remand is recommended so that the Administrative Law Judge can better analyze the factors of SSR 96-7p and explain his reasons for discounting plaintiff's testimony relating to her migraine headaches, the side effects of her medications, and the measures that she takes in order to reduce her pain; further, it is recommended that the Court remand the Administrative Law Judge's residual functional capacity for further analysis to the extent that it impacts his analysis of the CMS decision and plaintiff's credibility; however, it is recommended that the Court find no merit to plaintiff's specific residual functional capacity assertions (Related document 1 ). Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert on 8/11/09. (S,AA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dobrowolski v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kathy M Dobrowolski
Represented By:	John P. McGinnis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By:	Kathleen L. Midian
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?