Badri v. Huron Hospital et al
| Rafal A. Badri |
| Huron Hospital, Cleveland Clinic Health System, Gus Kious, Bev Lozar and Philbert Jones |
| 1:2008cv01913 |
| August 8, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Anti-Trust Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 15:1 Antitrust Litigation |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
Memorandum Opinion: Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted in its entirety, and all claims in the Amended Complaint are dismissed against all Defendants. (Related Doc # 66 ). Defendants' motion for sanctions is denied as moot (Related Doc # 73 ), and Plaintiff's counsel's motion to withdraw is granted. (Related Doc # 78 ). Counsel for Plaintiff isdirected to advise Plaintiff in writing of his appellate rights and the time table for filing an appeal from the Court's ruling on summary judgment. This case is dismissed. Judge Sara Lioi on 2/10/2010. (P,J)
|
|
Filing
36
Opinion and Order denying Defendants' Motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute (Related Doc # 26 ). The Court will conduct a telephonic status conference with lead counsel and all parties, including plaintiff, on June 26, 2009, at 8:30 a.m. to discuss the future of this litigation. At the status conference, the parties and their counsel should be prepared to discuss new dates and deadlines that shall govern the remainder of this litigation. Judge Sara Lioi on 6/15/2009.(B,IE)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
