Cook Paving & Construction Co., Inc. v. Teamsters Local Union No. 436 Excavating Building Material and Construction Drivers Pension Fund
Plaintiff: Cook Paving & Construction Co., Inc.
Defendant: Teamsters Local Union No. 436 Excavating Building Material and Construction Drivers Pension Fund
Case Number: 1:2008cv02086
Filed: August 29, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Other Statutory Actions Office
County: Cuyahoga
Presiding Judge: Donald C. Nugent
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 09:1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cook Paving & Construction Co., Inc. v. Teamsters Local Union No. 436 Excavating Building Material and Construction Drivers Pension Fund
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cook Paving & Construction Co., Inc.
Represented By: Jeffrey Perlmuter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Teamsters Local Union No. 436 Excavating Building Material and Construction Drivers Pension Fund
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?