Martin v. City of Broadview Heights, et al
| Tanya A Martin |
| City of Broadview Heights, City of Broadview Heights Police Department, Ryan Tieber, Michael Semanco, Scott Zimmerman, Rob Novotny, Robert Lipton, Steve Kopniske, Tim Scarbrough, John Doe I, John Doe II and John Doe III |
| 1:2008cv02165 |
| September 9, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| Solomon Oliver |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
Order granting Defendants' Motion to Amend (Related Doc # 58 ). The Conclusion of the courts August 18, 2011 Order is amended to reflect as follows: The court grants in part and denies in part Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 51.) The court grants summary judgment in favor of Officer Novotny for all Counts asserted against him. With respect to Officers Tieber, Semanco, and Zimmerman, the court grants summary judgment in their favor on Counts Four (unlawful restraint) , Five (negligence), and Nine (intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress); and denies summary judgment on Counts One (assault), Two (battery), Three (unreasonable seizure, unreasonable/unnecessary/excessive force), Seven (loss of con sortium), Eleven (wrongful death), Twelve (survivorship), and Thirteen (punitive damages). With respect to Defendants Lipton, Kopniske, Scarbrough, and the City of Broadview Heights Police Department, the court grants summary judgment in their favor on all Counts pled against them. With respect to the City, the court denies summary judgment on Count Six (negligent hiring/training/supervision), and grants summary judgment in its favor on all other Counts pled against it. Lastly, all John Doe Defendants are dismissed from the case. Signed by Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr on 10/31/2011. (D,M)
|
|
Filing
57
Order granting in part and denying in part Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Related Doc # 51 ). The court grants summary judgment in favor of Defendants for Counts Four, Five, Eight, Nine to the extent the claim is based on negli gence, Ten, and Eleven, to the extent the claim is based on negligence. The court grants summary judgment in favor of Defendant Novotny for all counts against him, which are Counts One, Two, Three, Four, Seven, Eleven, Twelve, and Thirteen. Pertainin g to Defendants Tieber, Semanco, and Zimmerman, the court denies summary judgment on Counts One, Two, Three, Nine, Eleven, Twelve, and Thirteen, and grants summary judgment in their favor on Counts Four. Pertaining to Defendants Lipton, Kopniske, and Scarbrough, the court grants summary judgment in their favor on all counts pled against them. Pertaining to the City, the court denies summary judgment on Counts Six and Thirteen and grants summary judgment in its favor on all other counts pled against it. Signed by Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr on 8/18/2011. (D,M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
