United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Thomas et al
| United States Securities and Exchange Commission |
| Raymond Thomas and Strictly Stocks Investment Co., Inc. |
| 1:2008cv02503 |
| October 22, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Securities/Commodities Office |
| Lake |
| Christopher A. Boyko |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
Order of Case Dismissal. The Court keeps in place its previous judgment entered requiring Defendants to pay disgorgement, prejudgment interest and penalties in the amounts previously set. Therefore, this matter is terminated pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 58, Related 10 . Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 06/17/09. (M,M)
|
|
Filing
10
Default Judgment on behalf of Plaintiff United States Securities and Exchange Commission and against Raymond Thomas and Strictly Stocks Investment Co., Inc. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 02/23/09. (M,M)
|
|
Filing
5
Order. Defendants have failed to file a timely answer and Plaintiff is requested to submit an appropriate motion, affidavit, request for entry of default, and proposed order for default judgment by December 30, 2008 or show cause why said defendants should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. 4 Return of Service Executed filed by United States Securities and Exchange Commission. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 12/19/08. (M,M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
