Westmoreland v. Sutherland et al
| Ron Westmoreland |
| Deborah L. Sutherland and City of Bay Village, Ohio |
| 1:2008cv02581 |
| October 31, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| Patricia A. Gaughan |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
Memorandum Opinion and Order: The Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant City of Bay Village (Doc. 37 ) and the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant Deborah L. Sutherland (Doc. 38 ) are GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 40 ) is DENIED. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 6/11/10. (LC,S)
|
|
Filing
36
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Defendant City of Bay Village's Partial Motion to Dismiss Count II of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint and defendant Deborah L. Sutherland's Partial Motion to Dismiss Count II of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint are GRANTED. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 11/24/09. (LC,S) re 26 , 27
|
|
Filing
23
Memorandum Opinion and Order: This matter is before the Court upon Defendants' Motion to Adopt Findings of Arbitrator and to Convert Motions to Dismiss to Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 19 ). Defendants' request to convert the motions is DENIED. The Court will treat Defendants Motion to Adopt Findings of Arbitrator as a motion for summary judgment. The motion is DENIED. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 9/9/09. (LC,S)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
