Malone v. Rancone et al
| Gordon P. Malone |
| FNU Rancone, FNU Belaney, FNU Fisher, FNU Joyce, FNU Compton, Rich Gansheimer, Terry Collins and Gary Croft |
| 1:2008cv02644 |
| November 7, 2008 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights (Prison Condition) Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| Patricia A. Gaughan |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
Memorandum Opinion and Order: The Motion of Defendants Erik Roncone and Rebecca Joyce for Summary Judgment is granted except for plaintiffs official capacity RLUIPA claim and due process claim against Joyce. Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment is denied. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 11/17/09. (LC,S) re 43 , 46
|
|
Filing
7
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Plaintiff's claims against Mr. Belany, Mr. Fisher, Mr. Compton, Mr. Gansheimer, Mr. Croft, and Mr. Collins are dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e). The court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sect ion 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. This action will proceed solely against Mr. Rancone and Ms. Joyce. The Clerk's Office is directed to forward the appropriate documents to the U.S. Marshal for service of process and shall include a copy of this order in the documents to be served upon the defendants. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 2/9/09. (LC,S)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
