Hodell-Natco Industries, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc. et al
Hodell-Natco Industries, Inc. |
SAP America, Inc., LSI-Lowery Systems, Inc. and The IBIS Group, Inc. |
1:2008cv02755 |
November 21, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Contract: Other Office |
Cuyahoga |
Lesley Wells |
Plaintiff |
Diversity |
28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 267 Memorandum Opinion and Order granting in part and denying in part 197 plaintiff's Motion in limine to preclude the testimony and opinions of Brooks Hilliard, MCM, CCP, as set forth in his expert report. Judge Lesley Wells(C,KA) |
Filing 192 Memorandum Opinion and Order adopting Magistrate Judge's R & Rs 182 , 183 . SAP's motion for summary judgment is denied. (Resolving Doc. 110 ). LSi/IBIS's motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part. ( Resolving Doc. 105 ). Specifically, the motion is granted as to Hodell's negligence claim and denied in other respects. Hodell's motion for judgment on the pleadings/motion for summary judgment is denied. (Resolving Doc. 109 ). Judge Lesley Wells(C,KA) Modified text 3/31/2014 (C,KA). |
Filing 61 Order Adopting Report and Recommendation re 50 . The SAP defendants motion to dismiss the amended complaint 36 is granted in part and denied in part, in accordance with the report and recommendation. Judge Lesley Wells(C,KA) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.