United States of America v. Euclid City School District Board of Education et al
| United States of America |
| Cuyahoga County Board of Elections and Euclid City School District Board of Education |
| 1:2008cv02832 |
| December 2, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Civil Rights: Voting Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| Kathleen M. O'Malley |
| None |
| U.S. Government Plaintiff |
| 28:1331 Fed. Question |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
Memorandum and Order. The Court concludes that DEFENDANT has proposed a legally acceptable remedy and ORDERS the Board and the Cuyahoga County Board of Elections to implement the LIMITED VOTING proposal outlined in its briefing and described in the 5/19-20/2009 remedial hearing before the Court. Judge Kathleen M. O'Malley on 7/13/2009. (H,CM)
|
|
Filing
45
Order. The Court issues this summary Order now and will explain the full rationale for reaching this result in the Opinion that will issue shortly. The Court concludes that the Defendant has proposed a legally acceptable remedy and Orders the Board and Cuyahoga County Board of Elections to implement the Limited Voting proposal, as described in the Board's briefing on this matter. Judge Kathleen M. O'Malley on 6/29/2009. (H,CM)
|
|
Filing
9
Order reassigning case to Judge Kathleen M. O'Malley for all further proceedings. Judge Christopher A. Boyko no longer assigned to case. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 12/04/08. (M,M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
