Thompson v. Anderson

Thompson v. Anderson

Petitioner:	Larry Dean Thompson
Respondent:	Carl Anderson
Case Number:	1:2008cv02913
Filed:	December 12, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office:	Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County:	Ashland
Presiding Judge:	Sara Lioi
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 13, 2010	Filing 34 Opinion and Order: The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 30 ) is accepted, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 11 ) is denied. Finding no cause for an evidentiary hearing, Petitioner's reques t for an evidentiary hearing (Doc. No. 33 ) is denied. This Court hereby certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from the decision would be frivolous and could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. Section 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). This action is dismissed. Judge Sara Lioi on 10/13/2010. (P,J)
March 19, 2010	Filing 30 Report and Recommended Decision. It is concluded that no claim of constitutional violation has been presented requiring further proceedings prior to disposition on the mertits, and it is, therefore, recommended that the petition be dismissed without further proceedings. Objections to R&R due by 4/2/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Perelman on 3/19/10. (W,Jo)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 13, 2010

Filing 34 Opinion and Order: The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 30 ) is accepted, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 11 ) is denied. Finding no cause for an evidentiary hearing, Petitioner's reques t for an evidentiary hearing (Doc. No. 33 ) is denied. This Court hereby certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from the decision would be frivolous and could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. Section 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). This action is dismissed. Judge Sara Lioi on 10/13/2010. (P,J)

March 19, 2010

Filing 30 Report and Recommended Decision. It is concluded that no claim of constitutional violation has been presented requiring further proceedings prior to disposition on the mertits, and it is, therefore, recommended that the petition be dismissed without further proceedings. Objections to R&R due by 4/2/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Perelman on 3/19/10. (W,Jo)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thompson v. Anderson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Larry Dean Thompson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Carl Anderson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?