Sollitt v. KeyCorp et al
| Kevin John Sollitt |
| KeyCorp and XYZ Corporations 1-10 |
| 1:2009cv00043 |
| January 8, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| James S. Gwin |
| Banks and Banking |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
103
Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 4/6/10 concerning plaintiff's motion for an order indicating that the Court will consider a Rule 60(b)(3) motion. As set forth in the Court's entry, the outcome of Key's summar y judgment motion was not prejudiced by Richard Owens's misrepresentation and the relief sought is inappropriate here. Should the Sixth Circuit affirm the grant of summary judgment to Key based solely on Owens's purported lack of knowledge of plaintiff's complaints, this Court would entertain plaintiff's Rule 60(b)(3) motion to probe the veracity of Owens's statement. Finally, once this Court again has jurisdiction over the case, it would be inclined to consider a motion for sanctions if plaintiff can show that Owens's statements were false. (Related Doc. 100 ) (M,G)
|
|
Filing
97
Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 11/9/09 denying defendants' bill of costs. (Related Docs. 92 , 93 ) (M,G)
|
|
Filing
88
Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 8/21/09 granting defendants' motion for summary judgment. (Related Doc. 44 ) (M,G)
|
|
Filing
69
Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 08/06/09 granting Motion to strike declaration of Laura Haskins. (Related Docs. 45 , 59 ).(S,HR)
|
|
Filing
68
Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 08/03/09 denying Motion for order finding that defendants lack an overriding business justification for plaintiff's termination. (Doc No. # 43 ) (S,HR)
|
|
Filing
34
Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 03/16/09 granting Plaintiff Sollitt's 17 motion to compel discovery. If Defendants are unable to comply with the discovery order as to any documents over which it lacks possession, the Court will require them to submit a brief specifically establishing: (1) their lack of custody or control over the requested information; (2) the entity in possession of such materials, if known; and (3) the steps taken to obtain such information and provide it to Plaintiff. The Court will consider imposing Rule 37 sanctions if Defendants do not demonstrate good faith in attempting to fully comply with this order. (S,HR)
|
|
Filing
23
Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 2/26/09 denying the motion of Defendant KeyCorp for a protective order. (Related Doc. 13 ) (M,G)
|
|
Filing
12
Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 2/11/09 denying the parties' proposed protective order. (Related Doc. 9 ) (M,G)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
