Kingston Digital, Inc v. Inkstop, Inc.
Plaintiff: Kingston Digital, Inc
Defendant: Inkstop, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2009cv00308
Filed: February 10, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: Cuyahoga
Presiding Judge: Patricia A Gaughan
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2009. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 4, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Order and Notice of Stipulated Dismissal Pursuant to Fed. Civ. R. 41 (A)(1)(A), with prejudice, each party to bear his or its own costs. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 6/2/09. (LC,S) re #14
June 2, 2009 Filing 14 Stipulated Settlement Notice filed by all parties. (Wall, Brett)
April 3, 2009 Filing 13 Case Management Order: Case Management Conference held on 4/3/09. Case assigned to the Standard Track. Case is suitable for ECF. Non-expert discovery due by 6/1/09. Expert Reports exchanged by N/A for party with burden of proof and N/A for rebuttal and Expert discovery due by N/A. Parties to be Joined and Pleading Amendments due by 5/1/09. Dispositive Motions due by 7/1/09. Settlement Conference is set 6/4/09 at 10:00 AM. Parties and lead counsel must appear in person unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 4/3/09. (LC,S) Time: 30 mins.
March 31, 2009 Filing 12 Report of Parties' Planning Meeting. Parties do not consent to this case being assigned to the magistrate judge. filed by Kingston Digital, Inc. (Proano, David) Modified text on 4/6/2009 (B,B).
March 30, 2009 Filing 11 Return of Service Unexecuted & Unclaimed upon Dawn Callahan by certified mail attempted on 2/14/09, 2/19/09, 3/1/09 filed on behalf of Kingston Digital, Inc (E,P)
March 27, 2009 Filing 10 Attorney Appearance of Brett A. Wall and David F. Proano by David F. Proano filed by on behalf of Kingston Digital, Inc. (Proano, David)
March 24, 2009 Opinion or Order Order [non-document: Order of 3/20/09 is hereby vacated due to a clerical error. Case Management Conference is still set 4/3/09 at 8:45 AM. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 3/24/09. (LC,S)
March 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Order [non-document]: Case management conference set 4/3/09 is continued to 5/14/09 at 8:45 AM to enable the Court to rule on the Motion for Remand prior to the Case management conference. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 3/19/09. (LC,S)
March 5, 2009 Filing 9 Answer to #1 Complaint, #2 Amended complaint filed by Inkstop, Inc. (Conti, Patricia) Modified text on 3/13/2009 (B,IE).
March 4, 2009 Filing 8 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order with case management conference set on 4/3/2009 at 09:15 a.m. to be held telephonically by Hon. Patricia A. Gaughan. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 3/04/09. (D,MB)
February 18, 2009 Filing 7 Return of Service Executed upon InkStop, Inc. by certified mail on 2/13/09 filed on behalf of Kingston Digital, Inc (E,P)
February 12, 2009 Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Kingston Digital, Inc identifying Corporate Parent Kingston Digital, Inc. for Kingston Digital, Inc. filed by Kingston Digital, Inc. (Bash, Brian)
February 11, 2009 Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Inkstop, Inc. and Dawn Callahan, Statutory Agent placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. Receipt # 70042890000180255232/70041160000054235116. (C,B)
February 11, 2009 Filing 5 Summons issued for service upon Inkstop, Inc. (B,IE)
February 11, 2009 Filing 4 Praecipe for issuance of Summons. filed by Kingston Digital, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Summons ; corrected)(Bash, Brian)
February 11, 2009 Filing 3 Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued for service upon Inkstop, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (C,KA) (summons incomplete/to be refiled/issued. Modified text 2/11/2009 (C,KA).
February 11, 2009 Judge Patricia A. Gaughan assigned to case. (C,KA)
February 11, 2009 Notice by Clerk that Kingston Digital, Inc., failed to file a corporate disclosure statement as required by Local Rule 3.13(b). (C,KA)
February 11, 2009 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Perelman. (C,KA)
February 10, 2009 Filing 2 UNSIGNED Amended complaint against Inkstop, Inc., filed by Kingston Digital, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits) (Bash, Brian) Modified text 2/11/2009 (C,KA).
February 10, 2009 Filing 1 UNSIGNED Complaint with jury demand against Inkstop, Inc. Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 06470000000003415823, filed by Kingston Digital, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Exhibits) (Bash, Brian) Modified text 2/11/2009 (C,KA).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kingston Digital, Inc v. Inkstop, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Inkstop, Inc.
Represented By: Patricia S. Conti
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kingston Digital, Inc
Represented By: Brian A. Bash
Represented By: Brett A. Wall
Represented By: David F. Proano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?