Majied v. Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners et al
| Michael Majied |
| Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners, Kenneth J. Lusnia, Marita Kavalec, Joyce Ritchie, William Fromwiller, Sandy Spilker, Kristin Ziemnik, Gladys Lumbus, Janice Almeida, Montago Bradley and SEIU District 1199 |
| 1:2009cv00344 |
| February 13, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| James S. Gwin |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
Memorandum and Order. Majied's former employer, the Cuyahoga County Court of Commons Pleas, Juvenile Court Division, is a political subdivision which is not a covered employer subject to LMRA. Therefore, the County defendants' moti on for judgment on the peladings 33 and the union's motion for summary judgment 37 are granted on the remaining federal LMRA claims. The state claims are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Plaintiff's motion for discovery 40 is denied as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth S. McHargh on 12/21/09. (R,N)
|
|
Filing
17
Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 8/14/09 as to the motion to dismiss of Defendants SEIU District 1199, Janice Almeida, Montago Bradley, and Gladys Lumbus. This Court will deny in part defendants' motion to dismiss becau se they have failed to demonstrate that this Court lacks jurisdiction over the plaintiff's claims. This Court will grant in part defendants motion to dismiss the plaintiff's Sec. 301 claim against the individual delegate defendants because individual union agents are immune from suit under Sec. 301. (Related Doc # 6 ) (M,G)
|
|
Filing
3
Memorandum of Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 6/10/09. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment, deprivation of civil rights pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Secs. 241, 242, a nd unfair labor practice claims under 5 U.S.C. Sec. 7116 are dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(e). The Court certifies that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. Plaintiff's Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act claims of breach and tortious interference, as well as his state law claims, shall proceed against the defendants. (Related Docs. 1 , 2 ) (M,G)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
