Faktor et al v. Lifestyle Lift et al
| Mary Faktor and John D Newby |
| Lifestyle Lift, Scientific Image Center Management, Inc. d/b/a Lifestyle Lift, David M. Kent, Lifestyle Holding, Inc. and David M Kent, D.O. |
| 1:2009cv00511 |
| March 6, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Contract: Other Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| James S. Gwin |
| Both |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Default |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
169
Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 1/15/10 denying plaintiff's motion to certify a class. (Related Doc. 90 ) (M,G)
|
|
Filing
152
Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 12/30/09 denying defendants' motion to transfer venue. (Related Doc. 99 ) (M,G)
|
|
Filing
58
Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 7/22/09. Defendants' motion to dismiss the breach of contract claims is denied. The motion to dismiss the fraudulent misrepresentation claims is granted with leave to amend the complaint. (Related Doc. 12 ) (M,G)
|
|
Filing
50
Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 6/3/09 denying defendants' motion to strike class allegations. (Related Doc. 28 ) (M,G)
|
|
Filing
49
Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 5/20/09 denying the parties' joint motion for protective order. (Related Doc. 31 ) (M,G)
|
|
Filing
46
Order signed by Judge James s. Gwin on 4/22/09 denying plaintiffs' motion to remand. (Related Doc. 33 ) (M,G)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
