United States of America v. Man's Multi-Dial Technolink Wristwatch Valued at $65,000.00 et al

Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Man's Multi-Dial Technolink Wristwatch Valued at $65,000.00 and Man's Scorpion Design Necklace Valued at $40,000.00
Case Number: 1:2009cv00758
Filed: April 2, 2009
Court: Ohio Northern District Court
Office: Forfeit/Penalty: Other Office
County: Cuyahoga
Presiding Judge: Patricia A. Gaughan
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Jury Demanded By: 28:1345 Complaint for Forfeiture

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Man's Multi-Dial Technolink Wristwatch Valued at $65,000.00 et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: James L. Morford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Man's Multi-Dial Technolink Wristwatch Valued at $65,000.00
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Man's Scorpion Design Necklace Valued at $40,000.00
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.