Dobrski v. Ford Motor Company
| Vincent Dobrski |
| Ford Motor Company |
| 1:2009cv00963 |
| April 27, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| Kathleen M. O'Malley |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
98
Order Adopting 93 Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, Ford's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 78 ) is granted. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 3/28/2013. (S,L)
|
|
Filing
77
Memorandum Opinion and Order The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Kenneth S. McHargh's Report and Recommendation. ECF No. 76 . Plaintiff Vincent Dobrski is ordered to pay Defendant Ford Motor Company a total of $4,444.90, with at least one thousand dollars $1,000.00 payable within 14 days from the date of this Order. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 5/14/2012. (S,L)
|
|
Filing
69
Memorandum Opinion and Order Plaintiff Vincent Dobrski's objection to Magistrate Judge McHargh's finding is overruled (ECF No. 68 ) and the Report and Recommendation is adopted in its entirety (ECF No. 67 ). Defendant's Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, or in the alternative Motion For Sanctions (ECF No. 60 ) is granted in part and denied in part. Defendant's request for sanctions is granted, and Defendant's request to dismiss the complaint is deni ed. The Court's final recommendation on the nature of Defendant's sanction will be postponed until after a hearing on potential sanctions has been conducted by the magistrate judge and the results of that hearing included in a Report and Recommendation to the Court. Additionally, Plaintiff's motion to extend discovery (ECF No. 57 ) and Plaintiff's motion to deny any further delay (ECF No. 62 ) are denied. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 2/2/2012. (S,L)
|
|
Filing
14
Opinion & Order . Defendant Ford's Motion to dismiss (Related Doc # 5 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff Dobrski shall have 14 days from date of this Order to amend his whistleblower retaliation claim to see if he can, in good faith, assert a cause of action under O.R.C. 4113.52(A)(3). Judge Kathleen M. O'Malley on 3/16/2010.(H,CM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dobrski v. Ford Motor Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Vincent Dobrski | |
| Represented By: | Jason B. Mizak |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ford Motor Company | |
| Represented By: | Janette M. Louard |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
