Case Wastern Reserve University v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa.
| Case Wastern Reserve University |
| National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. |
| 1:2009cv01007 |
| May 1, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| Dan Aaron Polster |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Case Wastern Reserve University v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Case Wastern Reserve University | |
| Represented By: | Peter M. Poulos |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. | |
| Represented By: | Steven G. Janik |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
